فهرست پایان نامه بررسی اثرات دستگاه Bionator بر روی رشد مندیبل درگروه های متفاوت رشد عمودی صورت
فهرست:
چکیده.................................................................................................................................................... 2-1
مقدمه (بیان مسئله)........................................................................................................................ 3
تاریخچه................................................................................................................................................. 18-4
بازنگری منابع موجود...................................................................................................................... 24-19
اهداف..................................................................................................................................................... 25
متغیرهای تحقیق.............................................................................................................................. 26-25
جامعه مورد بررسی تجربی........................................................................................................... 27
روش کار انواع تحقیق..................................................................................................................... 29-27
یافته ها (جداول- نمودارها)......................................................................................................... 38-29
بحث........................................................................................................................................................ 44-39
نتیجه گیری......................................................................................................................................... 44
محدودیت ها و پیشنهادات........................................................................................................... 45
خلاصه انگلیسی................................................................................................................................. 47-46
مراجع..................................................................................................................................................... 54-48
منبع:
1) Gianelly AA, Arena SA, Bernstein L.A: Comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, Edgewise and Frankel appliances. Am J Orthod 198 4; 86: 269-76.
2) Adenwalla ST, kronman JH: Class II division 1 treatment with Frankel and Edgewise applicances. Anlgle orthod 1985; 55:281-92.
3) Hellekant M, Lagerstrom L, Gleerup A: over bite and overjet correction in a class II, division 1 sample with edge wise therapy. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11: 91-106.
4) Owen AH: Maxillary in cisolabial responses in calss II, division 1 treatment with Frankel and Edgewise. Angle Orthod 1986; 56:67-57.
5) Remmer KR, Mamandras AH, Hunter WS, way DC: Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the Activator, the Frankel appliance, and the Fixed applicance. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 363-72.
6) Nelson B, Hansen K, Hagg U: overjet reduction and molar correction in fixed appliance treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusion: Sagittal and vertical components. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 13-23.
7) Nelson B, Hansen K, Hagg U: calss II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional applicances: A Comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000; 118: 142-49.
8) Weichbordt L, Ingervall B: Treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusion with the activator and with the Begg technique. Schweiz Monatsshr Zahnmed 1992; 102: 1037-45.
9) Aelbers CMF, Dermaut LR: Orthopedics in orthodontics: Part I, fiction or reality, a review of literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 513-19.
10) Ghafari J: Head gear versus function regulator in the early treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 51-61.
11) Petrovic A, Stutzmann JJ, Oudet C: control process in the postnatal growth of the condylar cartilage. In MC namara JA(ed): Determinats of mandibular form and growth, Monograph 4, Ann Arbor, Mich, 1975, Center for Human Growth and Development, the University of Michigan.
12) Rakosi T: The Bionator: a modified activator. In Graber TM et al 1969 (eds): Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances, ed 2, St Louis , Mosby 1977:265-75.
13) Pancherz H: The modern Herbst applicance. In Graber TM et al (eds): Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances, 2ed, St Louis, Mosby 1997.
14) MC Namara Jr JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG: A Comparison of the Herbst and Frankel appliances in the treatment of class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98: 134-44.
15) Orthon HS: functional appliances in orthodontic treatment: an atlas of clinical prescription and laboratory construction. London, Quintessence publishing 1990.
16) Skeiller V: Expansion of the midpalatal suture by removable plates, analysed by the implant method, Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1964, 143.
17) Briedon CM, Pangrazio-kulbersh V,kulbersh R: Maxillary skeletal and dental change with frankel appliance therapy: an implant study, Angle Orthod 1984; 54:226-232.
18) MC Namara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG: A comparison of the herbst and franked appliances in the treatment of class II malocclusion, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98: 134-144.
19) Jorgensen JO: Evening versus morning injections of growth hormone (GH) in GH-deficient patients: effects on 24-hour patterns of circulating hormones and metabo lites. J clin Endocrionol Method 1990; 70: 207-274.
20) Stevenson S: Is longitudinal bone growth in fluenced by diurnal variation in the mitotic activity of chondrocytes of growth plates? J Orthop Res 1990; 8:132-135.
21) Pancherz H: The mechanism of class II correction and Herbst appliance treatment a chephalometric investigation, Am J Orthod 1982; 83: 104-113.
22) Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Proffit WR: Benefit of early class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113:62-72.
23) Breitner C: Experimental change of the mesio-distal relations of the upper and lower dental arches. Angle Orthod 1933; 3:67-76.
24) Breitner C: Bone changes resulting from experimental orthodontic treatment, Am J Orthod 1940, 26:521-527.
25) Charlier JP, Petrovic A: Recherches sur la mandibular de raten culture d’organes: Le cartilage condylien a-t-il un potential de croissance independent? Orthod Fr 1967; 38: 165-175.
26) Charlier JP, Petrovic A, Hermann-stutzmann J: Effects of mandibular hyper propulsuin on the prechondro blastic zone of young rat condyle, Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 71-74.
27) MC Namara JA, Bryan FA: Long-term mandibular adaptations to protrusive function in the rhesus monkey (Macaca Mulatta). Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 92: 98-108.
28) Derichsweiler H: Experimentelle tieruntersuchungen liber verander ungen des kiefergelenkes bei bisslage veranderung, fortsuchr kieferorthop 1958; 19:30-44.
29) Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G: primate experiments in malocclusion and bone induction, Am J Orthod 1983; 83:460-468.
30) Petrovic AG: Experimental and cybernetic approaches to the mechanism of action of functional appliances on mandibular growth. In MC Namara JA, Ribbens KA: Malocclusion and the periodontium, Monograph 15, Ann Arbor, Mich, 1984, center for Human Growth and Development, the University of Michigan.
31) Petrovic A: Mechanisms and regulation of mandibular Condylar growth, Acta Morphol Neerl scand 1972; 10:25-34.
32) Petrovice A, Stutzmann JJ, Gasson N: The final length of the mandible: is it genetically determined? In Carlson DS (ed) : Craniofacial biology Monograph 10, Ann Arbor, Mich, 1981, Center for Human Growth and Development, the univesity of Michigan.
33) Ahn S, kim J T, Nahm DS: Cephalometric morkers to Consider in the treatment of class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Bionator. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthod 2001; 119: 578-86.
34) Wheeler T, Gorray S, Dolce C, Taylor MG, king GJ: Effectivness of early treatment of class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002; 121:9-17.
35) Rodrigues M, Henriques JF, Ursi W: Comparative study of the Frankel (FR-2) and Bionator appliances in the treatment of class II maloccusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002; 121: 458-66.
36) Illing M, Morris D, Lee R: A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and twin block appliances. Part 1- the hard tissues. Eur J Orthod 1998 ; 20 : 501-16.
37) Keeling S,wheeler T, king GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen D, Cabassa S, MC Gorray S, Taylor M: Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early class II treatment with Bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 40-50.
38) Wylie, WL: A quantitative method for the comparison of cranio- facial patterns in different individuals, its application to parents and offspring Am J Orthod 1944; 74: 39- 60.
39) Wylie WL: the assessment of antero-posterior dysplasia. Angle Orthod 1944; 17: 97-109.
40) Rakosi T, Jonas I, Graber T : Orthdontic Diagnosis. Color Atlas of Dental Medicine, TM. Medical Publishers Inc. , New York. 1993; 190-203.
41- اسلامیان ل : مقایسه کاربرد دو روش درمانی فانکشنال و کلاس II الاستیک
Edge wise در بیماران کلاس II اسکلتال – مجله دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی تهران؛ دوره 15 ، شماره 1 ، سال 1381.