پایان نامه بررسی UML از نظر قابلیت پوشش به چارچوب زکمن

فهرست پایان نامه بررسی UML از نظر قابلیت پوشش به چارچوب زکمن

فهرست:

فصل اول- معرفی

رویکرد سنتی به فناوری اطلاعات   ٢

رویکرد مبتنی بر معماری   ٨

تعریف مسئله      ١١

سابقه کار ١٢

خروجی ها         ١٤

ساختار پایان نامه ١٥

         فصل دوم- آشنایی با ادبیات معماری سازمانی                                              ١٧

                         ٢-١- مفاهیم پایه                                                              ١٨

                                          ٢-١-١- سازمان                                               ١٨

                                          ٢-١-٢- معماری                                              ٢٠

                                           ٢-١-٣- چارچوب                                            ٢٣

                          ٢-٢- اجرای معماری                                                         ٢٤

                          ٢-٣- چارچوب زکمن                                                        ٢٨

                          ٢-٤- خلاصه                                                                  ٣١

          فصل سوم- چارچوب های معماری سازمانی                                                ٣٤

                          ٣-١- تاریخچه                                                                 ٣٤

                          ٣-٢- چارچوب زکمن                                                        ٣٩

                          ٣-٣- چارچوب های فدرال                                                   ٤٩

                                           ٣-٣-١- چارچوب معماری C4ISR                         ٥٠

                                           ٣-٣-٢- چارچوب معماری سازمانی فدرال                 ٥٦

                                          ٣-٣-٣- چارچوب معماری سازمانی خزانه داری           ٥٨

                          ٣-٤- خلاصه                                                                  ٦١

          فصل چهارم- انتخاب، تعریف و حل مسئله                                                 ٦٤

                         ٤-١- مقایسه عمومی چارچوب ها                                            ٦٤

                                          ٤-١-١- مقایسه از نظر وجوه معماری                       ٦٥

                                          ٤-١-٢- مقایسه از نظر دیدگاه های معماری                ٦٦

                                           ٤-١-٣- مقایسه از نظر محصولات معماری                 ٦٧

                          ٤-٢- چالش های فراروی چارچوب زکمن                                  ٦٨

                                          ٤-٢-١- چالش متدولوژی                                    ٧٠

                                          ٤-٢-٢- چالش مخزن                                        ٧٢

                                          ٤-٢-٣- چالش مدل سازی                                   ٧٥

                                          ٤-٢-٤- چالش های عمومی                                 ٧٨

                         ٤-٣- استفاده از UML برای حل مشکل مدل سازی چارچوب زکمن    ٧٨

                                          ٤-٣-١- تعیین محدوده پاسخ                                ٧٩

                                          ٤-٣-٢- ارائه راه حل و دلایل انتخاب آن                   ٨٢

                          ٤-٤- خلاصه                                                                  ٩١

         فصل پنجم- مطالعه موردی                                                                  ٩٤

                          ٥-١- سازمان مورد مطالعه و لزوم معماری برای آن                        ٩٥

                                          ٥-١-١- مضمون معماری                                     ٩٦

                         ٥-٢- حل مسئله در حوزه راه حل                                           ٩٨

                                         ٥-٢-١- مدل سطر دوم، ستون داده                         ٩٩

                                          ٥-٢-٢- مدل سطر دوم، ستون کارکرد                    ١٠٠

                                         ٥-٢-٣- مدل سطر دوم، ستون شبکه                      ١٠٢

                                          ٥-٢-٤- مدل سطر دوم، ستون افراد                       ١٠٣

                                          ٥-٢-٥- مدل سطر دوم، ستون زمان                       ١٠٥

                                          ٥-٢-٦- مدل سطر دوم، ستون قواعد                      ١٠٧

                         ٥-٣- مدل های سطر سوم                                                  ١٠٩

                         ٥-٤- راه حل های جایگزین                                                 ١١١

                          ٥-٥- خلاصه                                                                ١١٤

        فصل ششم- نتیجه گیری                                                                   ١١٦

                         ٦-١- آیا مدل ها از قاعده دوم چارچوب، متابعت می کنند؟              ١١٧

                         ٦-٢- آیا مدل ها به اندازه کافی قابل پذیرش هستند؟                     ١٢٤

                                          ٦-٢-١- نتایج نظرسنجی                                   ١٢٥

                                          ٦-٢-٢- تحلیل نتایج                                        ١٢٦

                          ٦-٣- نظرات نویسنده                                                       ١٢٩

                         ٦-٤- فرصت های آینده                                                     ١٣١

                          ٦-٥- خلاصه                                                                 ١٣٤

         مراجع و منابع                                                                               ١٣٥

                          کتابها                                                                          ١٣٥

                          مقالات                                                                        ١٣٦

                         اسناد فنی                                                                     ١٣٧

                          مقالات آزاد                                                                   ١٣٨

                          صفحات وب                                                                  ١٣٩

                          گزارش های دانشگاهی                                                       ١٣٩

       ارائه ه

 کارگاه ها و دوره های آموزشی ١٤٠

پیوست ١- پرسشنامه

         واژه نامه                                                                                      ١٥١

 

منبع:

کتابها١

[B1] Cook, Melissa A. Building Enterprise Information Architectures, Reengineering Information Systems. Prentice Hall PTR. 1996.

[B2] Whitten, Jeffrey L., Lonnie D. Bentley, Kevin C. Ditten, Systems Analysis and Design Methods. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. 2001.

[B3] Martin, James, Information Engineering, Prentice Hall. 1990.  . ترجمه] قدرت سپیدنام . معماری کامپیوتر . انتشارات خراسان] ،Mano, M. Morris [B4]

 .١٣٧٦

[B5] Bass, L., P. Clements, R. Kazman. Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley. 1998.

[B6] Inmon, W., J. A. Zachman, J. G. Geiger. Data stores, data warehousing and the Zachman framework, Managing enterprise knowledge. McGraw-Hill. 1997.

[B7] Boar, Bernard H., Constructing Blueprints for Enterprise IT Architecture. John Wiley & Sons, 1999.

[B8] Griffith, Samuel B. (Translator), Sun-Tzu, Sunzi. The Art of War. Oxford Press. June 1971.

[B9] Spewak, Steven H., Enterprise Architecture Planning : Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications, and Technology. John Wiley & Sons. September 1993.

[B10] O’Rourke, Carol and Neal Fishman. Enterprise Architecture Using the Zachman Framework. Course Technology. March 24, 2003.

1 B = Book

[B11] [ترجمه] مینا، نرگس،راهنمای برنامه ریزی سیستم های اطلاعاتی بر اساس متدولوژی

»بی.اس.پی« شرکت آی.بی.ام. ، شرکت داده پردازی ایران. ١٣٧٧.

[B12] روحانی رانکوهی، سید محمد تقی. مفاهیم بنیادی پایگاه داده ها، انتشارات جلوه، پاییز

 .١٣٨٠

[B11] Vernadat, F.B. CIMOSA - A European Development for Enterprise Integration. The MIT Press. 1992.

[B12] Scheer, A. W. Business Process Engineering: Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises. Springer - Verlag. 1989.

[B13] Allen, Paul and Stuart Frost. Component-Based Development for Enterprise Systems: Applying SELECT Perspectoive. Cambridge University Press. 1998.

[B14] Bennet, Simon, John Skelton and Ken Lunn. Shaum’s Outlines UML.

McGraw-Hill. 2001.

[B15] Walsh, Aaron E. J2EE 1.4 Essentials. Wiley Publishing, Inc. 2003. [B16] Kruchiten, Philippe. The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction (2nd Edition). Addison Wesley Pub, Co. March 14, 2000.

 

مقالات٢

[P1] Zachman, John A., A framework for information systems architecture, IBM Systems Journal 26, No. 3, 276-292, 1987.

[P2] Sowa, J. F. and J. A. Zachman, Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture, IBM Systems Journal 31, No. 3, 590-616, 1992.

[P3] Sowell, P. Kathie. The C4ISR Architecture Framework : History, Status and Plans for Evolution.

[P4] Whitman, Larry, Katrick Ramachandran and Vikram Ketkar. A Taxonomy of a Living Model of the Enterprise. Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference. 2001.

[P5] Curtis, B., I. M. Kellner and J. Over. Process Modelling. Communications of the ACM, 35(9). 1992.

2 P = Paper

[P6] Fatolahi, Ali and Fereidoon Shams. An Object Meta-Model for Zachman Framework. Proceedings of the International Management Conference, Tehran, Iran. 2003.

[P7] Fatolahi, Ali and Fereidoon Shams. Contextual Criteria to Select a Framework for Enterprise Architecture. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Electronic Business. National University of Singapore. 2003.

[P8] Wilton, David R. The Relationship between  IT Strategic Planning and Enterprise Architecture Practice. Journal of BattleField Technology, Vol 4, No. 1. March 2001.

[P9] Martin, Richard and Edward L. Robertson. Formalization of Multi-Level Zachman Frameworks. April 1999.

[P10] Fatolahi, Ali and Hamid Reza Nikoofar. A Modular Approach to C4ISR using Systems Engineering Methodology. 15th IRMA International Conference. New Oeleans, Louisiana, USA. 2004.

[P11] Fatolahi, Ali and Shahram Jalalinia. Building Transition Architectures using Zachman Framework. (to be Appeared) IIEC2004. Tehran, Iran.

 

اسناد فنی٣

[T1] Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework Version 1.1, Chief Information Officers Council, September 1999.

[T2] Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework Version 1, Chief Information Officers Council, Department of the Treasury, July 2000.

[T3] System Architect v8.0 2001 Manuals. Building an Enterprise Architecture: The Popkin Process, Version 1.0. Popkin Company. 2001.

[T4] Architecture Alignament and Assesment Guide. Chief Informations Officers Council. October 2000.

[T5] راهنمای مدیریت و نگهداشت معماری فناوری اطلاعات. مرکز مهندسی نرم افزار،شرکت ایزایران. تاسبتان ١٣٨٢.

[T6] A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture, Version 1.0. Chief Information Officers Council. February 2001.

[T7] Information Architecture Definition and Documentation Methodology. US Department of Energy. February 6, 1997.

3 T = Technical Document

[T8] System Architect v8.0 2001 Manuals. Building an Enterprise Architecture: The Popkin Process, Version 1.0. Popkin Company. 2001.

[T9] C4ISR Architecture Working Group, DoD C4ISR Architecture Framework, Version 2.0. Department of Defense. 18 December 1997. [T10] IEEE Standard 1220-1998. IEEE Standard for Application and Management of the Systems Engineering Process. 8 December 1998. [T11] DoD architecture Framework Woring Group. DoD Architecture Framework, Version 1.0. Department of Defense, USA. 30 Aguest 2003. [T12] Object Management Group. OMG Unified Modeling Language

Specification.. 2001.

[T13] Office of Managmenet and Budget. Clinger-Cohen Act. USA. 1996.

[T14] Department of Transportation, Office of the Chief Information Officer. PRELIMINARY E-GOVERNMENT AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

STRATEGIC PLAN. September 2003.

 

مقالات آزاد٤

[W1] Moriarty, Terry. Metaprise To Unify Architecture With Methodology: The Rational Unified Process meets the Zachman Information Systems architecture. Intelligent Enterprise. April 16, 2001.

[W2] de Villiers, DJ. Using the Zachman Framework to Assess the Rational Unified Process. Rational Edge. March 2001.

[W3] Zachman, John A. Bibliography. ZIFA.

[W4] Hay, David C. A Different Kind of Life Cycle: The Zachman Framework. Essential Strategies Inc., 2000.

[W5] Sowell, P. Kathie. The C4ISR Architecture Framework: History, Status and Plans for Evolution. The MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia. [W6] Zachman, John A. The Framework for Enterprise Architecture – Cell Definitions. ZIFA.

[W7] Maley, Joseph and James, Long. Systems Engineering: a Natural Methodology for C4ISR. Vitech Corporation. 2002.

[W8] Prof. Alain Wegmann. The Systemic Enterprise Architecture Methodology (SEAM): Business and IT Alignment for Competiveness. Technical Report EPFL/I&C No. 200265.

4 W = White Paper

 

[W9] Martin, Richard. Formalization of Multi-Level Zachman Frameworks. Technical Report No. 522. Computer Science Department, Indiana University. April 1999.

[W10] Henning, Ronda R. Use of the Zachman Architecture for Security Engineering. Harris Corporation, Information Systems Division, Melbourne. [W11] Heumann, Jim. Introduction to Business Modeling using the Unified Modeling Language (UML). Rational Edge. 2001.

[W12] Sayles, Allen. Development of Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework using the IBM Rational Unified Process and the Unified Modeling Language. Rational Edge. 2003.

 

صفحات وب٥

[I1] www.rational.com/products/rup/index.jsp

[I2] www.zifa.com

[I3] www.popkin.com

[I4] www.cio.gov

[I5] government.popkin.com/frameworks/feaf.htm

[I6] government.popkin.com/frameworks/teaf.htm

[I7] www.opengroup.org

[I8] www.opengroup.org/architecture/adml/adml_home.htm

[I9] www.microsoft.com/office/visio

[I10] www-136.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/products/rose

[I11] www.sparxsystems.com.au/ea.htm

[I12] www.popkin.com/products/system_architect.htm

 

گزارش های دانشگاهی٦

[A1] فتح اللهی، علی . گزارش سمینار کارشناسی ارشد: انطباق چارچوب معماری سازمانیفدرال با نرم افزارSystem Architect . دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، دانشکده مهندسی برق وکامپیوتر، تهران، ایران. اسفندماه ١٣٨١.

 

                                                           

5  I = Internet Page

ارائه ها٧

[S1] Osvalds, Gundars. Bridging the Zachman Framework with Object Oriented Models. Northrop Grumman Information Technology. December 3, 2001.

[S2] Schekkerman, J. Be Enterprising: Facts and Figures about EA. 2003.

(Available from www.enterprise-architecture.info)

کارگاه ها و دوره های آموزشی٨ Nebras Informatics Co. [C1]. مدلسازی سازمان بر اساسUML . دانشکده مهندسیکامپیوتر، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف. تابستان ١٣٨٢.